David Jay Jordan's
Part 3
Evolution is a LIE
THE MONKEY-MEN
29. THERE ARE NO MAN-APES AND NO APE-MEN, and all that baloney you read about and see pictures of in
most of today's biology textbooks is just hellish, fiendish, tommyrot! All those half-ape, half-man ape-men and
man-apes, screaming and grinning and groaning like a bunch of horrors from some nether-world down in the
depths of hell are imaginary monsters created by the fiendish mind of the Devil and promulgated by men.
30. And although we do not usually like to soil our fingers or pollute our minds with the dirty lies of dirty liars, it
might be helpful to some of you if we at least balance the scales with the truth while pointing out a few of the
ridiculous boners and fallacies of the theory of "the descent of man," which is currently taught as gospel truth and
historical fact by most of today's "educators."
31. This might at least clarify the issues in your own minds and give you a little more effective ammunition to fire
back at them in defense of the truth so you can "be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you,"
as the Apostle Peter said (1Pet.3:15). We will now briefly examine the most famous of the fossil remains which are
supposed to have been the forerunners of modern man and the theories surrounding them.
32. YOU WILL NOTICE THAT THE EVOLUTIONISTS HAVE CHOSEN SOME VERY LONG AND
DIFFICULT-TO-PRONOUNCE NAMES FOR THEIR "MISSING-LINKS", the foundation stones, or bones, on
which their faith is built. Doing this sort of thing envelopes it all with a shroud of mystery and even puts a little
superstitious awe into the minds of the average laymen. Like many other religious authorities, the high priests of
the "sacred cow" of false-science has done this to give credence to their faith and to gain reverence for themselves!
33. Darwin claimed that "The Simiadae (monkeys) branched off into two great stems, The New World and The Old
World monkeys; and from the latter, at a remote period, Man, the wonder and glory of the universe, proceeded." In
other words, great and glorious man evolved himself from a monkey and was not created by God in His image, as
the Bible says!
34. However, THE SCIENTISTS SOON FOUND IT IMPOSSIBLE to reconstruct a halfway believable evolutionary
chain showing man rising from the ape family, so they had to cook up a new theory--which they promptly did!
35. NOW the modern evolutionists believe that man came not from the apes, but from an older, more primitive
primate who was the common ancestor of both the apes and man! But as far as any fossil evidence to prove this new
theory, New Scientist magazine commented: "The unmistakable correspondence between man and anthropoids
points clearly to a common ancestor. BUT IT HAS NOT YET BEEN FOUND AND WE MAY HAVE SOME
DIFFICULTY IN RECOGNIZING IT."
36. As for any EVIDENCE to prove early man's progressive evolution FROM this supposed "common ancestor," the
prominent evolutionists who wrote the book The Primates confessed, "Unfortunately, the early stages of man's
evolutionary progress along his individual line remain A TOTAL MYSTERY."
37. Scientific American likewise stated: "The nature of the line leading to living man ... remains A MATTER OF
PURE THEORY." So the very basis or foundation of the evolutionary teaching that man has descended from a
lower, ape-like form is "a matter of pure theory," cooked up by a bunch of nincompoops who are perpetrating on
the world what the Bible refers to as "the VAIN BABBLINGS OF SCIENCE FALSELY SO CALLED." (1Tim.6:20)
38. The first actual fossils that the evolutionist classify as "the earliest known form of man" are said to belong to a
species called "THE AUSTRALOPITHECINES," or the "man-apes" of Africa. Although their brains were only a
third as large as modern man's, it is theorised by some that they were toolmakers and therefore men. But even
many of the evolutionists, including the famed explorer and anthropologist J.T. Robinson, have disputed this,
claiming that the tool-making was not done by these so-called "man-apes" at all, but by true men!
39. Another well-known evolutionist, Le Gros Clark, warned of the Australopithecines: "The terms 'man' and
'human' can only be applied to them with some reserve, for there is NO CERTAIN EVIDENCE that they possessed
any of the special attributes which are commonly associated with the human beings of today." And R.L. Lehrman,
another evolutionist, wrote in his book, "AUSTRALOPITHECUS WAS MERELY AN UPRIGHT, INTELLIGENT
APE, NOT A MAN. The small braincase bearing heavy ridges over the eyes, across the back, and down the center
was like that of any ape."
40 The next fella the evolutionists usually show us on their near little evolutionary sequence from monkey to to
man is "PITHECANTHROPUS ERECTUS," whom they affectionately refer to as "JAVAMAN" for short. He was
discovered in a Javanese river bed in 1891 by Professor Dubois, a young Dutchman who was greatly influenced by
the erroneous teachings of Ernst Haeckle. Haeckle was an ardent German evolutionist who concocted and was
caught in several 'scientific' frauds' openly praised and perpetrated evolutionary theory as a means by which he
hoped to destroy Christianity and all faiths in God, and was the first to construct the imaginary evolutionary
"family tree" showing how life rose from non-life and how today's creatures evolved from more primitive forms.
41. The section of Haeckle's fraudulent family tree that most interested and eventually obsessed young Dubois was
the branch which led from ape to man, where, by an act of blind faith, Haeckle had placed an unknown,
undiscovered "link" whom he named "Pithecanthropus erectus," which literally means "walking ape-man."
42. DUBOIS WAS CHALLENGED WITH THE THOUGHT OF PERSONALLY DISCOVERING THE
"MISSING-LINK" and soon forsook home and career as he set out for Java, where in 1887 he began a determined
search, digging doggedly for the as yet unknown bones. Then four years later this dog had his day and Dubois'
moment of glory arrived as he gleefully made his announcement to a waiting world: At last, out ancient ancestor,
the long sought "link" between man and monkey was found! Thus was "Java Man" born and christened with the
name his godless godfather Haeckle had reserved for him, "Pithecanthropus erectus."
43. HIS FAME AND ACCLAIM WERE IMMEDIATE and today in almost any museum of natural history you can
find elaborate busts and reconstructions of him, giving his viewers the impression that they are beholding a
creature who was found like the mastodon, embedded in ice, perfectly preserved for our awe and admiration. Or if
you prefer full-colour portraits of him romping about in his natural habitat with his friends and fellows, you need
but consult any standard textbook on biology or anthropology and there you'll find him in colourful detail--showing
that, indeed, the very hairs of his head are numbered.
44. Little does the uninformed person imagine that these awe-inspiring masterpieces are the reconstructions of
THREE MOLAR TEETH, A FRAGMENT OF A SKULL CAP, AND A LEFT THIGH BONE -- found over 50 feet
apart in an old riverbed in Java! Neither do they tell you. as does the 1949 textbook Mankind So Far, that after the
world had accepted Dubois' "missing link", "One voice alone now cried that the Java Man was not a man, but a
giant, tree-walking gibbon. ... And here it was that Pithecanthropus felt the unkindest cut of all. For the voice was
the voice of Dr. Dubois himself." Yes after further studying his fossils, Dubois decided and announced with
certainty that "Java Man" was merely an extinct ape or monkey, and was not the "missing link" after all!
Continue to Part 4 Evolution is a Big Lie